Q4 2019, Pavilion REIT recorded a total gross revenue of RM145.962 mil, a contraction of RM1.0 mil or 1% as compared to Q4 2018. The decrease was explained by management in the report due to lower occupancy and rental rate at DA MEN mall. In fact, I find this explanation is not really correct. I will explain my observation later.
Q4 and FY19 PBT contracted due to higher property operating expenses and lower valuation of investment properties. The improve in FY19 revenue mainly thanks to the newly acquisition of new shopping mall- Elite Pavilion Mall.
When I look into revenue breakdown for respective retail and office properties, Q4 report shown that, only pavilion kuala lumpur mall was improving, it increased by 1% compared to preceding year Q4, Intermark Mall, Da Men Mall, Elite Pavilion Mall and Pavilion Tower were reduced by 8%, 12%, 3% and 4% respectively.
Total revenue for FY19 was 5% higher compared to preceding financial year. This was mainly contributed by newly acquisition of Elite Pavilion Mall at the end of April 2018, higher revenue rent and electricity income from Pavilion K.L. Mall for supplying electricity to Pavilion Hotel and Pavilion Suites. However, the gain was partially offset by lower rental income from Intermark Mall, Da Men Mall and Pavilion Tower.
From the summary in table above, Intermark Mall, Da Men Mall and Pavilion Tower rental income were decreased by 8%, 21% and 6% compared to preceding financial year.
Total property operating expenses was higher by RM8.6 million or 19% compared to Q4 2018. This was mainly due to the costs incurred for tenancy lots enhancement at Pavilion Kuala Lumpur Mall and DA MEN Mall, preventive maintenance of lift doors as well as upgrading of some common areas in Pavilion Tower, marketing expenses incurred for Deepavali and Christmas events, upgrading of advertising media as well as writing off of non-recoverable debts.
Fair value gain of RM15.0 million arising from the valuation of investment properties as at 31 December 2019 was recognised in the current quarter, mainly contributed by Pavilion Kuala Lumpur Mall. The fair value gain for 2018 recognised in Q4 2018 was RM33.6 million.
Tenancy Status for each property:
Pavilion K.L Mall
Intermark Mall
Da Men Mall
Elite Pavilion Mall
Observation:
1. Pavilion KL Mall, Q4 FY 19 has lower occupancy rate compared to preceding year corresponding quarter but revenue increased.
2. However, Intermark Mall was having lower revenue although higher occupancy rate was achieved.
3. Da Men Mall occupancy rate reduces even management had improved retail facilities
4. Elite Pavilion Mall is facing lower occupancy rate compared to previous year.
Comment:
Downside Risk
Da Men Mall is the most under-performed retail. I would said this is a wrong investment plan made by the management, as they fail to implement those success strategies from Pavilion KL Mall onto Da Men Mall. 3 years CAGR of Da Men Mall is -16%. Moreover Da Men Mall property value for FY19 was reduced by 29% compared to preceding year. Over these years, no clear business strategy was mentioned by the management, they were just mainly focusing on upgrading existing facilities.
The management's business direction is to expand its asset profile through acquisition opportunities rather than reviewing their marketing plan. A wrong investment, it will be another retail like Da Men Mall keeping under its asset. Pavreit management is too relied on their properties geographical advantages in running their business. I feel that the management should be more aggressive to attract more shoppers and retain them, in order to increase and retain their tenants as well.
I would give a sell call for Pavreit as the result was not growing even though a new shopping mall has been acquired and most of their retails are in city center. By taking the retail sales growth rate of 4.6% for 2020 estimated by Retail Group Malaysia, I forecast FY20 EPS would be remained lackluster.